Oasis Documentary Essay

The story of Lee Chang-dong’s artistic career is a fascinating one. He started as a novelist before moving to the medium of film in his late thirties, first as a screenwriter for Korean New Wave director Park Kwang-su, and then eventually as a director in 1996 at the age of 42. He claims to have made this move because he wanted to have his stories continue to reach a wide audience, and that Korean culture by the 1990s had largely moved from the written word to visual communication (1). Perhaps even more remarkable is the degree to which he has been successful in this task. Because of Lee’s use of genre conventions (and due to the particular national culture in which he works), he has made films that, while not blockbusters, have nevertheless reached large audiences within his native South Korea (2). In many ways, his 2002 film Oasis is the best example of Lee’s provocative combination of genre, stylistic realism, and harsh social critique. It also marks a transitional moment in his career, away from the male protagonists of Chorok mulkogi (Green Fish, 1996) and Bakha satang (Peppermint Candy, 1999) and towards the female-centered dramas of Milyang (Secret Sunshine, 2007) and Shi (Poetry, 2010).

Oasis tells the story of two outcasts from Korean society who eventually come together to form an unlikely romantic couple. Jong-du (Sul Kyoung-gu) has just been released from prison for vehicular homicide, and finds that his family has moved without telling him of their whereabouts. He goes to apologise to the family of the man he killed, and meets his daughter, Gong-ju (Moon So-ri). She suffers from cerebral palsy and is also ignored within her family, abandoned by her brother even though he lives off her government subsidy. Although they will eventually form a couple, Lee presents their initial meeting in harsh terms, as Jong-du attempts to sexually assault Gong-ju. He later apologises, and while it is difficult to fully accept and embrace a romance that starts in this manner, it is testimony to Gong-ju’s loneliness that she will accept and forgive even this man. And although he does not seem like a traditionally rebellious anti-hero, Jong-du becomes one despite himself as he refuses the hypocrisy of the society that surrounds him. While others admonish him to think before he speaks, what they are really asking is that he perform the same dishonesty as everyone else. As Lee’s very tightly structured plot begins to unfold, we start to realise the full extent of the corruption that surrounds the couple. And it is through this manipulation of this romantic, star-crossed lovers plot that Lee is able to both immerse his audience emotionally and make an intensely angry and political film at the same time.

The best illustration of the film’s themes and Lee’s stylistic approach occurs in two contrasting restaurant scenes. The first is played out entirely in one shot. The couple enters a restaurant, are told it is closing (because the presence of the physically disabled Gong-ju makes the management uncomfortable), and then move outside. The way Lee plays this scene out in one long, uncomfortable take, and then frames the couple as they are ejected from this social space, expresses visually everything you need to know about their situation. The next restaurant sequence is longer and more complex in its construction. It is set during a family dinner for Jong-du’s mother. The family is visibly unsettled by the presence of Gong-ju, but they at least begin by being somewhat polite. Lee films the scene in a rather conventional shot/reverse shot manner, but the mood shifts when it is revealed Gong-ju is the daughter of the man Jong-du has killed. At this point, his two brothers take him into a hallway and confront him, and the full extent of the family’s hypocrisy is revealed. This is played-out in two long takes. The scene with the family ends with the couple once again excluded, as Jong-du’s brother refuses to allow Gong-ju in the family picture. However, this time, Jong-du claims a degree of agency, stating that he will not be in the picture either and leaving with Gong-ju into the cold night. Through these two painful encounters with the world of South Korean society, represented in microcosm by the social unit of the family, the couple’s bond is ultimately formed. Shortly afterwards, on a subway platform, Gong-ju fantasises about getting out of her wheelchair and singing with Jong-du. For the first time in the film, they unite in a shared fantasy, a relationship forged by the cruelness of others, yet with a truth and authenticity that the rest of this world lacks.

In describing his approach to the film, particularly its ending, Lee stated that, “It would have been easy to make a touching scene if I wanted to. And there were lots of requests to do so. But I thought what I could do was to present their dream and their cry for help. Nothing more.” (4) By remaining true to this rather modest goal, Lee created a powerful and emotional statement that ranks among the greatest of all melodramas that have used the form for political commentary and critique.


  1. Kim Young-jin, Lee Chang-dong, Seoul, Korean Film Council, 2007, p. 90.
  2. Oasis was the 13th highest grossing Korean film of 2002, with over 500,000 ticket sales in Seoul. Secret Sunshine was the 11th ranked Korean film at the 2007 box office, with over 500,000 ticket sales in Seoul and 1.7 million nationwide. Figures taken from http://koreanfilm.org/ via the Korean Film Council.
  3. Kim, 71.

Oasis(2002 South Korea 132 mins)

Prod Co: Dream Venture Capital/East Film Company/UniKorea Pictures Prod: Cho Min-cheul, Jay Jeon, Myeong Gye-nam Dir, Scr: Lee Chang-dong Phot: Choi Yeong-taek Ed: Kim Hyun Art Dir: Shin Jum-hee, Kil Won Yu Mus: Lee Jae-jin

Cast: Sul Kyoung-gu, Moon So-ri, Ahn Nae-sang, Ryoo Seung-wan, Chu Kwi-Jung, Kim Jin-gu

I was living in England in the fall of 1995 when a little album called (What’s the Story) Morning Glory? by Oasis landed in stores. It’s difficult to explain to people who weren’t there just how big an event this was nationwide. There’s no equivalent that I’ve seen stateside since. Oasis wasn’t just a musical phenomenon; they were the biggest news in the country. Headlines in major newspapers centered on the band and their charismatic but contentious brothers Liam and Noel Gallagher. At its best, “Oasis: Supersonic,” the new documentary about Oasis, captures this sense of instant superstardom, such as in moments in which the band is stunned at how many people know the words to even their new songs at concerts. In the span of two albums, 1994’s Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory, the guys from Oasis had gone from getting high in their mom’s house and playing small gigs to being gigantic stars. But “Supersonic” focuses almost entirely on that rise, offering insight into how they got to the top of the world, even if it comes up short in explaining why they didn’t stay there for long.


The stories about the “bad boy behavior” from Liam Gallagher are notorious and plentiful, and “Oasis: Supersonic” doesn’t shy away from the tabloid aspects of Oasis. Before it even gets going, Liam has been compared to a Ferrari (fun but dangerous) and phrases like “head cases” and “out of control” have been used. And the film rests on the same thing Oasis did—the odd dynamic between Liam and Noel Gallagher that created both fantastic music and miserable days on stage and behind the scenes. Noel compares himself to a cat and Liam to a dog—Noel needs to be alone, writing songs and doing his own thing; Liam needs attention and love. One of the best lines is “Noel has a lot of buttons, Liam has a lot of fingers.”

What most Oasis fans knew at the time and is even clearer now is that Noel was an amazing songwriter. His songwriting for the first two albums (which is all the film focuses on, to its detriment) is something stunning to behold. Basically, director Mat Whitecross’ film gives the impression that Noel’s songwriting was something of a God-given talent. After being talked into forming Oasis after being fired from being a roadie for the Inspiral Carpets, Noel became the kind of songwriter who just wandered in with instant hits. Early on in the film, they’re sort of just screwing around and he comes up with “Live Forever.” One of the bandmates, Bonehead, didn’t even believe he had written it.

Another day, they ordered takeout and Noel says, “I wrote Supersonic in the time it takes six other guys to eat a Chinese meal.” They recorded Morning Glory at the rate of a song a day. Noel would give Liam the lyrics, he would sing it, and they would move on. They have a recording of “Champagne Supernova” which looks like it’s the first time that Liam is singing it off a notepad, and it’s basically perfect.

Of course, many fans who already know how much they love Oasis will come to the film looking for dirt, and there’s not much here. We get a little bit of family insight in terms of how the brothers were treated by their father. They both watched their dad beat their mother, but the old man only abused Liam, who literally says that he “beat the talent into [him].” We hear horror stories about Liam’s on-stage behavior, including the fact that Noel became a singer merely because Liam would leave the stage almost an hour early and someone had to finish out the concert. We hear about almost-breakups and some of the shuffling of the rest of the band.


And then “Oasis: Supersonic” kind of just ends. With a two-hour film, Whitecross doesn’t get very far in the overall history of the band, focusing solely on their bumpy rise to the top and ignoring everything that’s happened since then. We don’t even see Liam or Noel, who do their interviews in voiceover over archival footage. There’s something interesting about staying there in that peak ‘90s moment of fame, but someone completely unfamiliar with Oasis might think they broke up in the mid-‘90s. (They released five more albums, some of which were very well received.) While “Oasis: Supersonic” is never boring, especially for fans, it’s also not quite deep enough to justify its narrow focus, especially at its overlong running time. There’s more to the Oasis story than what we see here, even if this does capture that historic moment when two brothers from Manchester fronted the biggest band in the world. There was something special about Oasis that will never happen again in an era when albums don’t sell and social media would destroy a self-destructive personality like Liam Gallagher. Trust me. I was there.

Reveal Commentscomments powered by
Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Oasis Documentary Essay”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *